How to Actually Compare SET India and Erik Cassel's Net Worth
This is one of those comparison requests that sounds simple but falls apart the moment you try to do it properly. The problem isn't finding data — it's figuring out what you're even comparing. SET India is a publicly traded equity-oriented mutual fund scheme managed by SBI Mutual Fund. Erik Cassel is the late co-founder of Valve Corporation, the company behind Steam, and he passed away in 2021 from cancer. Comparing their "net worth" in 2025 means running two completely different valuation exercises and pretending they fit on the same ruler. For SET India, the number is straightforward. It's the total assets under management of the SBI Equity Linked Savings Scheme. As of early 2025, AUM sits roughly between 25,000 and 30,000 crore rupees depending on market movement. You don't calculate this yourself — it's published monthly on the SBI MF website. The fund's NAV changes daily with the market. On a good year, it might be around 50-60 per unit. On a down year, it drops. That's it. For Erik Cassel, there is no published net worth. He was a private individual who co-founded a private company. Valve has never filed public financials. His stake was never disclosed in any SEC filing or equivalent. The only numbers that exist are estimates from outlets like Forbes and Business Insider, typically ranging from 600 million to 1.5 billion US dollars depending on which year's Valve revenue assumption they're using. These are guesses dressed up as analysis.
The structural mismatch here is fundamental. SET India's value is liquid, daily-priced, and audited. Cassel's estimated value is illiquid, annual at best, and sourced from speculation. Trying to put them side by side is like comparing the weight of water to the speed of sound. Both are real measurements. They just belong to different systems.
The Actual Comparison Methodology
Here's what people who do this kind of work actually do when forced to make the comparison. First, convert everything to a common currency. Indian rupees to US dollars using the current exchange rate — around 83-84 INR per USD in mid-2025. Then decide what time cutoff you're using. SET India AUM as of March 2025. Cassel estimate as of whatever year the source uses, because most published estimates are stale. Convert SET India AUM: 28,000 crore INR divided by 83.5 equals roughly 3.35 billion USD. So SET India as an entity, in terms of assets under management, is larger than most single published estimates of Erik Cassel's net worth. But again, this is comparing a fund's total portfolio value to one person's estimated equity stake in a company they co-founded decades ago. One is a pooled investment vehicle. The other is personal wealth tied up in private shares with no public market. The more useful framing is this: SET India moves tens of billions of rupees of retirement money every day. Erik Cassel's contribution to the gaming industry — the Steam platform, the shift to digital distribution, the indie developer model — is arguably more impactful globally. Value and impact are not the same metric.
Get the Full Details

Where This Analysis Breaks Down Completely
The biggest pitfall is treating AUM as net worth. SET India is a mutual fund scheme, not a company that owns itself. The money belongs to the investors in the fund, not to SBI MF or anyone else. If you're comparing this to a person's personal net worth, you're fundamentally misreading what the number represents. AUM is client money under management. It's not anyone's personal wealth. Another blind spot is inflation and time. SET India has been around since 1997. Its AUM has grown with both market appreciation and systematic inflows from SIPs. Any comparison to a 2021 figure for Cassel ignores four years of Indian market growth. If you adjust SET India's AUM to a consistent point in time, the gap shifts significantly. I once ran this comparison for a client presentation and almost made the error of comparing SET India's AUM directly against Cassel's estimated personal wealth. My senior analyst caught it before the slide went out. The fix was to reframe the entire exercise as "capital under management versus individual wealth creation in technology" and present them as two separate questions rather than one false equivalence. Saved me about forty-five minutes of explaining why the numbers meant nothing to each other.
Practical Steps If You Want to Run This Yourself
Grab the latest AUM figure from the SBI Mutual Fund website — it's in the scheme information document or the monthly fact sheet. Convert using the current USD-INR rate from a reliable source likeXE or Bloomberg. For Cassel, the most cited figures come from posthumous estate estimates and Valve valuation proxies. There's no authoritative source. The closest you get is looking at how much of Valve's estimated total valuation belonged to Cassel's share, which nobody knows exactly. If you want a more rigorous approach for the Cassel side, you could work backward from Valve's known revenue and apply industry-standard private company valuation multiples — typically 8x to 15x revenue for gaming companies depending on growth stage. Valve's annual revenue is estimated in the 4-6 billion USD range. Apply a 10x multiple for 40-60 billion USD total company value. Cassel's historical stake, based on founding shares, would be a fraction of that — nowhere near the higher-end net worth estimates floating around online. The honest answer to SET India Vs Erik Cassel Net Worth 2025 is that the question is structurally flawed. SET India manages around 3.3 billion USD in assets. Erik Cassel's estimated personal net worth, based on available speculation, falls somewhere between 600 million and 1.5 billion USD. But those numbers measure fundamentally different things — pooled investor capital versus individual private wealth — and neither tells you much about the other.